Impact of the Guru Penggerak Programme on Improving Leadership Competence in Numeracy Learning

Authors

  • Imron Imron SMA Negeri 1 Lasem, Rembang, Indonesia
  • Amir Mahmud Manajemen Pendidikan, Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Achmad Samsudin Pendidikan Fisika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v19i1.3499

Keywords:

Guru Penggerak, Competencies, Learning Leadership

Abstract

Education of Guru Penggerak is the Government's innovation to prepare for future leadership transformation. Before becoming a leader, the teacher mobiliser is required to be the main actor in classroom learning and mobilise peers through a community of practice. Thus, they are expected to become leaders in school management and development. Candidate of Guru Penggerak, after undergoing Education and Training for 6 months covering 10 modules, will become student-centred learning leaders. The implementation of quality student-centred learning has not been optimal and equitable from one region to another. The low level of literacy and numeracy in the education report card has led the Government to launch the Merdeka Belajar Programme. The purpose of the research conducted on prospective Guru Penggerak is to determine the impact of Education of Guru Penggerak on improving learning through improving grades during education and increasing competence in self-development and learning leadership, knowing the motivation of prospective Guru Penggerak after completing education and whether literacy and numeracy materials are needed. The research method uses quantitative descriptive research using data collection techniques of interviews, documentation, questionnaires and observations, pre-test-post test scores and questionnaires on prospective Guru Penggerak. The results obtained from this study are an average increase from the pre-test score of 50.80 to the average post-test score of 64.58 or an increase of 13.77. From the questionnaire, the competence of self-development and others increased from 76.82% to 87.35%. For learning leadership competence there was an increase from 73.03% to 85.04%

References

M. Abduh, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Peserta Didik Melalui AKM (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum),” Aug. 18, 2020.

G. Pambudi, “Asesmen Nasional / Kompetensi Minimal (AKM),” Nov. 04, 2022. https://pusatdapodik.com/asesmen-nasional-kompetensi-minimal-akm/ (accessed May 25, 2023).

Kemendikbudristek, “RAPOR PENDIDIKAN PUBLIK 2022 | Enhanced Reader,” Aug. 07, 2022. https://btikp.babelprov.go.id/sites/default/files/dokumen/bank_data/Rapor Pendidikan Paket C Tahun Ajaran 2021_2022.pdf (accessed May 25, 2023).

Kemendikbud, “Sebagian Besar Kebijakan Kemendikbud ke Depan Terkait Guru,” Kemendikbud, Dec. 12, 2019. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/ blog/2019/12/sebagian-besar-kebijakan-kemendikbud-k e-depan-terkait-guru (accessed May 25, 2023).

A. H. Hasanah, “PENGARUH PERANAN GURU PENGGERAK DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PROFIL PELAJAR PANCASILA DI SEKOLAH ,” Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 2022.

F. Silvia Sofyan and A. Riswandi Sanusi, “PENTINGNYA WAJAR DIKDAS 12 TAHUN UNTUK MENYONGSONG INDONESIA EMAS TAHUN 2022,” in PROSIDING KONFERENSI NASIONAL PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN UNIVERSITAS BUANA PERJUANGAN KARAWANG, Apr. 2023, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2411–2420, Accessed: May 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journal.ubpkarawang.ac.id/index.php/ProsidingKNPP/article/view/5218.

S. Sardjoko, “PERENCANAAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA (SDM) DALAM RPJMN : MENUJU INDONESIA MAJU,” Mar. 10, 2020.

Muliantara, I. K., & Suarni, N. K. (2022). Strategi Menguatkan Literasi dan Numerasi untuk Mendukung Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 4847–4855. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2847

Gervasi, D., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Maley, J. (2022). Reciprocity in Organizational Behavior Studies: A Systematic Literature Review of Contents, Types, and Directions. European Management Journal, 40(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.07.008

Van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2020). Fostering Collaborative Teacher Learning: A Typology of School Leadership. European Journal of Education, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12391

Saleh, I. T., Muhidin, M., Zakiah, Qiqi Yuliati, Erihadiana, M., & Suhartini, A. (2021). Karakteristik, Proses Keputusan, Difusi, Diseminasi dan Strategi Inovasi Pendidikan. Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v4i1.453

Schröer, A. (2021). Social Innovation in Education and Social Service Organizations. Challenges, Actors, and Approaches to Foster Social Innovation. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.555624

Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620920576

S. Revinah, “Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Empat Dekade Terakhir di Indonesia: Satu Langkah Maju, Dua Langkah Mundur” Nov. 4, 2020. https://rise.smeru.or.id/id/blog/pengembangan-profesionalisme-guru-dalam-empat-dekade-terakhir-di-indonesia-satu-langkah-maju diakses (accessed Mar. 5, 2023).

Hamid H Lubis, S., Milfayetti, S., Lubis, M. J., & Purba, S. (2022). Peningkatan Sumber Daya Manusia Guru melalui Program Guru Penggerak.Jurnal Health Sains, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v3i6.441

Urbani, C. (2020). Teacher Continuing Professional Development and Team Working Competences: A Case Study from Italy. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.2.6

Faiz, A., & Faridah, F. (2022). Program Guru Penggerak Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v14i1.1876

Kurniawaty, I., & Faiz, A. (2022). Konsep Dilema Etika dalam Pengambilan Keputusan: Tinjauan Pustaka dalam Modul Guru Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2961

OECD. (2018). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-for-development-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264305274-en

Kemendikbud. “Uji Kompetensi Guru (UKG) 2015” Nov. 4, 2015. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2015/11/uji-kompetensi-guru-ukg-2015-4800 (accessed Mar. 5, 2023).

Riowati, R., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2022). Peran Guru Penggerak pada Merdeka Belajar untuk Memperbaiki Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI) 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3393

Puertas-Aguilar, M. Á., Álvarez-Otero, J., & de Lázaro-Torres, M. L. (2021). The challenge of Teacher Training in the 2030 Agenda Framework Using Geotechnologies. Education Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080381

Sumaryanta., D. Mardapi., Sugiman., and T. Herawan. (2019). Community-Based Teacher Training: Transformation of Sustainable Teacher Empowerment Strategy in Indonesia. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0004

Raagas, M. J. R. (2021). Alignment of School and Leadership Practices in Basic Education with Response-to-Intervention Model. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.144

Istiqomah, I. (2022). The Perceptions of Pendidikan Guru Penggerak Towards Blended Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.717

Garcia-Retamero, R., Sobkow, A., Petrova, D., Garrido, D., & Traczyk, J. (2019). Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far? Spanish Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.16

Ardiyan, L., Purba, S., Siburian, P., & Sinaga, O. (2022). Perbedaan Kreativitas Guru Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Adversity Quotient Dan Status Guru Penggerak. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v3i6.564

Ardiyan, L. A., H Lubis, S. H., AB, R. A., Gultom, S. G., & Simaremare, A. S. (2022). Gambaran Kepemimpingan Pembelajaran Guru Penggerak. Syntax Idea, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v4i06.1871

Mello, Jeffrey A. 2015. Human Recources Management Practice. USA: Cengage Learning.

Nakidien, T., Sayed, Y., & Sadeck, O. (2022). Unpacking the Efficacy of a Continuous Professional Development Programme to Support Teachers to Use Assessment in No-Fee Schools. Journal of Education (South Africa), 87. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i87a03

Nurwahidah, I., & Muhtar, T. (2022). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3113

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

[1]
I. Imron, A. Mahmud, and A. Samsudin, “Impact of the Guru Penggerak Programme on Improving Leadership Competence in Numeracy Learning”, ME, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71-82, May 2023.

Issue

Section

Articles