About the Journal

ISSN 2477-5185 (On-line) ISSN 2302-6030 (Print)
CODEN (Chemical Abstract Services): JAKUA7
The Jurnal is published quarterly (February, May, August and November)
Publisher: Universitas Tadulako
Accreditation: SINTA 3 (Decree No. 204/E/KPT/2022)
Editor in Chief: Prof. Daud K. Walanda, PhD.

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Akademika Kimia is an electronic open-access journal that aims to publish the latest research results in the area of chemistry education and pure chemistry from academicians, professionals, and other practitioners at all levels of chemistry education. The journal coverage includes the following: current trends of professional chemistry education, educational technology, teacher education, educational science, learning assessment, learning models and development of learning materials, as well as pure chemistry including organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, analytical chemistry, physical chemistry, biochemistry and other chemistry fields such as environmental chemistry, that emphasis on a broad description of the general methods and processes for the synthesis, modification, and characterization of chemical materials.

History of Journal

The history of the Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) can be best described by the following timeline of events.

Year	Information
2012-2019	Articles from Volumes 1 to 4 (Issues 1–3) were published on the former website ( http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JAK/). These articles are currently inaccessible because the website has been decommissioned by the university.
2019	Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) migrated from its previous website ( http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JAK/) to a new website: http://jurnal.fkip.untad.ac.id/index.php/jak/.
2019-2022	Articles published in Volume 9 Issue 4 until Volume 11 were made available on http://jurnal.fkip.untad.ac.id/index.php/jak/.
2023-2024	The JAK website was inaccessible until July 2024, resulting in delays in the publication of Volumes 12 and 13 and a decline in the number of manuscripts submitted and accepted.
2024	Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) migrated from jurnal.fkip.untad.ac.id to its current website: https://jurnalfkipuntad.com/index.php/jak/ .
2024	Due to the limited number of accepted manuscripts, Volume 13 was published with five articles per issue.
2025	Starting from Volume 14, Issue 3, the journal adopted a revised manuscript template, with modifications to the keyword section and an increase in the minimum reference requirement from 15 to 25.
2023-2026	Manuscripts accepted for Volume 12 (1–4) through Volume 15 (Issues 1 and 2) have not yet been managed in full accordance with the journal's standard Submission–Peer Review–Editing–Production workflow, as described in the author guidelines. This was due to adjustments required following the website migration and the restoration of the journal management system.

Electronic Filing

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is committed to ensuring the systematic management, security, integrity, accessibility, and preservation of electronic records generated throughout the scholarly publication process. Effective electronic filing is essential to support transparency, accountability, editorial efficiency, and the long-term maintenance of the scholarly record.
This Electronic Filing Policy establishes the framework for the creation, submission, storage, management, access, retention, and preservation of electronic documents and records associated with the journal's editorial and publishing activities.

1. Purpose

The purpose of this policy is to:

Establish standardized procedures for the management of electronic records.
Ensure the accuracy, authenticity, and reliability of records maintained by the journal.
Protect confidential information related to manuscripts, authors, reviewers, and editorial activities.
Support editorial operations through organized and accessible document management.
Facilitate the long-term preservation of scholarly publications and related records.
Promote compliance with recognized standards of academic publishing and research integrity.

2. Scope

This policy applies to all electronic records generated, received, processed, or stored by Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) during its publishing activities, including but not limited to:

Manuscript submissions.
Author declarations and supporting documents.
Editorial correspondence.
Peer-review reports and recommendations.
Editorial decisions.
Revised manuscript versions.
Copyediting and proofreading files.
Publication files and metadata.
Post-publication notices and corrections.
Administrative records related to journal operations.

The policy applies to authors, reviewers, editors, editorial staff, journal administrators, and other authorized personnel who participate in the publication process.

3. Electronic Submission and Record Creation

All manuscripts and supporting documents shall be submitted electronically through the journal's designated submission platform or other officially authorized channels.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that:

Submitted files are complete, accurate, and readable.
Information provided during submission is truthful and up to date.
Documents comply with the journal's submission requirements.
Any required declarations, permissions, or supporting materials are supplied at the time of submission.

Electronic records created through the submission process shall become part of the journal's official publication record and may be retained in accordance with this policy.

4. Management of Electronic Records

JAK shall maintain electronic records in an organized and structured manner to support efficient retrieval, monitoring, and documentation of editorial activities.

Electronic records may include:

Original submitted manuscripts.
Revised versions of manuscripts.
Peer-review documentation.
Editorial communications and decisions.
Acceptance and rejection notifications.
Publication-ready files.
Published articles and accompanying metadata.

Where multiple versions of a manuscript exist, the journal shall maintain appropriate records to distinguish the different stages of editorial processing and publication.

5. Confidentiality and Restricted Access

JAK recognizes the confidential nature of many records generated during the publication process.

Access to confidential electronic records shall be restricted to individuals with legitimate editorial, administrative, or technical responsibilities. Confidential information shall not be disclosed to unauthorized parties except where required by law, institutional policy, or ethical investigations.

The confidentiality obligations apply particularly to:

Unpublished manuscripts.
Reviewer identities and reports.
Personal information of authors and reviewers.
Editorial deliberations and decisions.

All individuals involved in the publication process are expected to respect and maintain the confidentiality of records to which they are granted access.

6. Data Security and Protection

JAK shall implement reasonable administrative and technical measures to safeguard electronic records against:

Unauthorized access.
Accidental alteration.
Data corruption.
Unauthorized disclosure.
Accidental deletion.
Loss resulting from technical failure or security incidents.

Authorized users are responsible for protecting access credentials and ensuring that journal-related data are handled in a secure and professional manner.

7. Backup and Recovery Procedures

To reduce the risk of permanent data loss, the journal shall maintain periodic backup procedures for essential electronic records and publication content.

Backup procedures may include:

Preservation of manuscript files.
Storage of publication metadata.
Protection of editorial records.
Retention of published articles and supporting files.

Where necessary, recovery procedures may be implemented to restore records following system failures, technical disruptions, or other unforeseen incidents affecting data availability.

8. Retention of Electronic Records

Electronic records shall be retained for periods deemed necessary to support:

Editorial administration.
Publication integrity.
Academic accountability.
Ethical investigations.
Historical and archival purposes.

The journal reserves the right to retain relevant records for as long as necessary to preserve the integrity of the scholarly record and to address questions concerning published content.

9. Preservation of Published Content

Published articles constitute part of the permanent scholarly record of Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK).

The journal is committed to maintaining ongoing access to published content through appropriate preservation practices, which may include:

Local digital storage.
Routine backup systems.
Metadata preservation.
Participation in recognized archiving and preservation services where applicable.

The objective of these preservation activities is to support the continued accessibility, authenticity, and integrity of the journal's published content.

10. Integrity of the Scholarly Record

Electronic records shall not be intentionally altered, removed, or manipulated in a manner that misrepresents the history of editorial review, publication decisions, or published research.

Where corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other post-publication actions are required, the journal shall maintain appropriate documentation to ensure transparency and preserve the integrity of the scholarly record.

11. Responsibilities

Authors

Authors are responsible for submitting accurate, complete, and original materials and for ensuring that all uploaded documents comply with journal requirements.

Reviewers

Reviewers are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of manuscripts and associated records received during the review process and for using such information solely for editorial evaluation purposes.

Editors and Editorial Staff

Editors and editorial staff are responsible for ensuring the proper management, security, and maintenance of electronic records throughout the publication process.

Journal Administrators and Technical Personnel

Journal administrators and authorized technical personnel are responsible for maintaining the functionality, reliability, and security of the journal's electronic filing systems and related infrastructure.

12. Policy Review and Amendment

This policy may be reviewed and revised periodically to accommodate developments in scholarly publishing, digital technologies, information management practices, legal requirements, and ethical standards.

Any amendments approved by the Editorial Board shall become effective upon publication on the journal's official website.

13. Effective Date

This Electronic Filing Policy shall take effect upon its approval by the Editorial Board of Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) and shall apply to all electronic records managed by the journal thereafter.

Authorship Criteria

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) requires that all listed authors have made substantial intellectual contributions to the research and manuscript and meet accepted standards of authorship responsibility. Authorship should be limited to individuals who have significantly contributed to the conception or design of the study, data acquisition, analysis or interpretation, manuscript drafting or critical revision, approved the final version of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for the accuracy, integrity, and ethical conduct of the work. To promote transparency and appropriate recognition of individual contributions, JAK encourages authors to provide a detailed Author Contribution Statement in accordance with the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy), which may include roles such as Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, and Funding Acquisition. Individuals who do not meet the authorship criteria should be acknowledged appropriately but should not be listed as authors. The journal does not accept guest, gift, or ghost authorship and reserves the right to investigate any authorship disputes or ethical concerns in accordance with its publication ethics policies. All authors must approve the final manuscript prior to submission and comply with the ethical standards and authorship requirements established by the journal.

1. Criteria for Authorship

To qualify as an author, an individual must have made substantial contributions to the research and must meet all of the following criteria:

Significant contribution to the conception or design of the study, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data.
Participation in drafting the manuscript or critically revising it for important intellectual content.
Approval of the final version of the manuscript prior to submission and publication.
Accountability for the work, including the accuracy, integrity, and ethical conduct of the research.

Individuals who meet all of these criteria should be listed as authors.

2. Corresponding Author

The corresponding author is responsible for:

Ensuring that all eligible contributors are appropriately listed as authors.
Confirming that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Managing communication between the journal and co-authors during the submission, peer-review, and publication processes.
Ensuring compliance with the journal's ethical standards and policies.
Promptly informing the Editorial Office of any changes related to authorship.

The corresponding author acts as the primary contact throughout the publication process and after publication.

3. Contributors Who Do Not Qualify for Authorship

Individuals who contribute to a study but do not meet all authorship criteria should not be listed as authors. Such contributions may include:

Providing funding or financial support.
General supervision of a research group.
Technical assistance or laboratory support.
Administrative support.
Language editing, proofreading, or formatting assistance.
Data collection without substantial intellectual contribution.

These individuals may be acknowledged in the Acknowledgments section with their permission.

4. Authorship Order

The order of authors should be determined collectively by all co-authors before manuscript submission. JAK does not prescribe a specific method for determining author order; however, all authors should agree on the sequence and accept responsibility for their respective contributions.

Any disputes regarding authorship order must be resolved by the authors and/or their institutions before submission.

5. Changes in Authorship

Requests to add, remove, or rearrange authors after manuscript submission will be considered only under exceptional circumstances and must:

Be submitted in writing by the corresponding author.
Include a clear explanation for the requested change.
Provide written consent from all affected authors.
Receive approval from the Editor-in-Chief.

The Editorial Board reserves the right to request additional documentation before approving authorship changes.

6. Prohibited Authorship Practices

JAK does not accept unethical authorship practices, including:

Guest (Honorary) Authorship

Listing individuals as authors who have not made substantial contributions to the work.

Gift Authorship

Granting authorship as a favor, out of respect, or due to a personal or professional relationship rather than actual contribution.

Ghost Authorship

Failing to acknowledge individuals who made substantial contributions to the research or manuscript preparation.

Any evidence of authorship misconduct may result in manuscript rejection, publication disclosed.

Manuscript Types

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) publishes high-quality scientific contributions in the fields of chemistry, chemistry education, materials chemistry, analytical chemistry, environmental chemistry, physical chemistry, organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and other related disciplines. The journal accepts three main categories of manuscripts: Research Article, Review Article, and Short Communication. All submissions must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration by any other journal. Manuscripts are evaluated through a rigorous peer-review process based on scientific quality, originality, significance, and relevance to the journal's scope.

1. Research Article

Research Articles report original research findings that contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in chemistry and related fields. Manuscripts should present clearly defined objectives, robust methodology, comprehensive data analysis, and meaningful scientific discussion.

Structure

Title
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgments (if applicable)
Conflict of Interest Statement
References

Length

Total length: 6–15 pages
Recommended word count: 4,000–8,000 words (including references, tables, and figures)

2. Review Article

Review Articles provide a comprehensive, critical, and systematic analysis of the existing literature on a specific topic within the journal's scope. Reviews should identify current developments, emerging trends, research gaps, and future directions.

The journal particularly encourages reviews that offer new perspectives and critical insights rather than merely summarizing published studies.

Structure

Title
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Main Review Sections
Critical Analysis and Discussion
Future Perspectives
Conclusion
Conflict of Interest Statement
References

Length

Total length: 10–25 pages
Recommended word count: 6,000–12,000 words

Allegation of Research Misconduct

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) takes all allegations of research misconduct seriously and investigates concerns in a fair, confidential, and transparent manner. Research misconduct may include plagiarism, data fabrication, data falsification, duplicate publication, authorship manipulation, peer-review manipulation, ethical violations, and undisclosed conflicts of interest. Allegations may be raised by authors, reviewers, editors, readers, or institutions and must be supported by reasonable evidence. Following investigation, the journal may take appropriate actions, including corrections, expressions of concern, manuscript rejection, article retraction, or notification of relevant institutions. JAK is committed to protecting the integrity of the scholarly record and promoting the highest standards of publication ethics and research integrity.

1. Definition of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct refers to any action that compromises the integrity, reliability, or ethical conduct of research and scholarly publication. Allegations of misconduct may include, but are not limited to:

Plagiarism, including unattributed use of another person's work, ideas, data, figures, or text.
Data fabrication, involving the invention of data or research results.
Data falsification, involving manipulation, selective reporting, or alteration of research data, images, or results.
Duplicate or redundant publication, including simultaneous submission to multiple journals.
Improper authorship practices, such as guest, gift, or ghost authorship.
Manipulation of the peer-review process.
Undisclosed conflicts of interest that could affect the objectivity of the research.
Misappropriation of research results or intellectual property.
Violations of research ethics, including the absence of required ethical approvals or informed consent where applicable.

2. Submission of Allegations

Allegations of research misconduct may be submitted by authors, reviewers, editors, readers, institutions, or any other party with reasonable grounds for concern.

Allegations should:

Be submitted in writing to the Editorial Office.
Provide sufficient evidence or documentation to support the claim.
Clearly identify the article, manuscript, or research activity involved.
Be submitted in good faith and based on factual concerns.

The identity of whistleblowers will be treated confidentially whenever possible and in accordance with applicable laws and ethical standards.

3. Preliminary Assessment

Upon receiving an allegation, the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board will conduct an initial assessment to determine whether:

The allegation falls within the scope of publication ethics or research misconduct.
There is sufficient evidence to warrant further investigation.
Immediate action is required to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

If the allegation is found to be unsupported or outside the journal's jurisdiction, the matter may be closed without further action.

4. Investigation Process

When an allegation warrants further review, JAK will conduct a fair, objective, and confidential investigation. The investigation may include:

Reviewing the submitted evidence and related publication records.
Contacting the corresponding author and co-authors for explanation.
Requesting original data, ethical approval documents, or supporting materials.
Consulting independent experts, reviewers, or editorial board members when necessary.
Communicating with the authors' institutions, funding agencies, or relevant authorities if appropriate.

All parties involved will be given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the allegations.

5. Confidentiality and Fairness

Throughout the investigation process, JAK will:

Treat all allegations confidentially.
Avoid conflicts of interest among investigators and decision-makers.
Ensure that allegations are evaluated objectively and impartially.
Respect the rights and reputations of all parties involved.
Follow principles of due process and natural justice.

An allegation alone does not constitute evidence of misconduct, and no conclusions will be reached until the investigation is completed.

6. Outcomes and Editorial Actions

Depending on the findings of the investigation, the Editorial Board may take one or more of the following actions:

No action if the allegation is not substantiated.
Request clarification or correction from the authors.
Publish a correction, corrigendum, or erratum.
Publish an Expression of Concern.
Reject the manuscript under review.
Retract the published article.
Notify the authors' institution(s), funding body, or relevant authority.
Restrict future submissions from authors found responsible for serious misconduct.

The severity of the editorial action will be proportionate to the nature and impact of the misconduct.

7. Cooperation with Institutions

JAK recognizes that academic institutions and research organizations are often best positioned to conduct comprehensive investigations into research misconduct. Therefore, the journal may cooperate with authors' institutions, ethics committees, funding organizations, and other appropriate authorities during the investigation process.

The journal reserves the right to suspend editorial processing while institutional investigations are ongoing.

8. Post-Investigation Record

To preserve the integrity of the scientific record, JAK may publish corrections, editorial notices, expressions of concern, or retractions when necessary. Such notices will remain permanently linked to the relevant publication and will clearly explain the basis for the editorial decision.

9. Commitment to Research Integrity

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is committed to fostering a culture of honesty, transparency, accountability, and responsible research conduct. The journal expects authors, reviewers, editors, and readers to uphold the highest standards of professional and ethical behavior throughout the research and publication process.

Conflict of Interest Policy

1. Authors

Authors must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or personal relationships that may be perceived as influencing the conduct, analysis, interpretation, or reporting of their research. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to:

Research funding, grants, or sponsorship from organizations that may benefit from the research findings.
Employment, consultancy, advisory roles, or board memberships related to the subject of the manuscript.
Ownership of stocks, shares, patents, or other intellectual property interests connected to the research.
Personal or professional relationships that could affect the objectivity of the work.

All disclosures must be provided at the time of manuscript submission. If no conflict of interest exists, authors should include the following statement:

“The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.”

2. Reviewers

Reviewers must decline to review a manuscript if they have any conflict of interest with the authors, affiliated institutions, funding agencies, or the subject matter of the research that could compromise their impartiality.

Reviewers are also required to maintain the confidentiality of all information obtained during the peer-review process and must not use unpublished materials for personal or professional advantage.

3. Editors

Editors are responsible for making editorial decisions solely on the basis of scientific merit, originality, relevance, and quality of the manuscript.

Editors must not be influenced by commercial interests, personal relationships, institutional affiliations, or any other non-academic considerations.

Editors who identify a potential conflict of interest regarding a submitted manuscript must withdraw from handling the manuscript and assign it to another editor.

4. Editorial Board and Journal Management

Members of the Editorial Board and journal management team must ensure that all editorial and publishing decisions are free from undue influence.

They shall avoid situations in which personal, professional, or financial interests may interfere with the fair and objective management of the journal.

5. Management of Conflicts of Interest

When a potential conflict of interest is identified before or after publication, the Editorial Board of Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) will investigate the matter in accordance with established publication ethics guidelines.

Appropriate actions may include:

Requesting additional disclosures.
Publishing corrections or clarifications.
Issuing editorial notices.
Retracting the article when necessary.

6. Commitment to Transparency

By submitting a manuscript to Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK), authors agree to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest and to comply with the journal’s ethical standards. The journal is committed to maintaining a transparent, fair, and unbiased peer-review and publication process for the benefit of the scientific community.

Post-Publication Discussion

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) welcomes constructive post-publication discussions that contribute to scientific advancement and academic debate. Readers may submit comments, critiques, or clarifications concerning published articles, provided that such contributions are respectful, evidence-based, and relevant to the scientific content of the article. The Editorial Board will evaluate all submissions and may invite responses from the original authors. Accepted discussions and responses may be published as part of the permanent scholarly record and may lead to corrections, editorial notes, expressions of concern, or retractions when warranted. JAK is committed to maintaining transparent, professional, and ethical scholarly communication.

1. Purpose of Post-Publication Discussion

The purpose of post-publication discussion is to provide readers, researchers, and members of the scientific community with an opportunity to:

Comment on published articles.
Discuss scientific interpretations, methodologies, and conclusions.
Identify potential errors or inconsistencies.
Present alternative perspectives supported by scientific evidence.
Encourage academic exchange and collaboration within the field of chemistry and related disciplines.

All discussions should be conducted in a professional, respectful, and evidence-based manner.

2. Forms of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussion may include:

Letters to the Editor.
Scholarly Comments.
Responses or Replies from Authors.
Editorial Notes.
Expressions of Concern related to published research.
Other communications deemed relevant by the Editorial Board.

The Editorial Board reserves the right to determine the most appropriate format for publication.

3. Submission of Comments

Readers who wish to comment on a published article should submit their communication to the Editorial Office through the journal's official submission or correspondence system.

The submission should:

Clearly identify the article being discussed.
Be concise, objective, and scientifically justified.
Provide supporting evidence and relevant references when applicable.
Avoid personal criticism, defamatory statements, or unsupported allegations.

The Editorial Board may reject submissions that do not meet these requirements.

4. Editorial Evaluation

All post-publication comments will be reviewed by the Editorial Board before publication.

The evaluation will consider:

Scientific relevance and significance.
Accuracy and supporting evidence.
Compliance with ethical and professional standards.
Potential contribution to academic discourse.

Where appropriate, the journal may seek additional expert opinions before making a decision regarding publication.

5. Author Response

Authors of the original article may be invited to respond to comments or criticisms concerning their published work.

The response will be reviewed by the Editorial Board and, when accepted, may be published alongside or subsequent to the discussion to ensure a balanced scholarly exchange.

Authors are expected to address concerns professionally and provide evidence-based explanations or clarifications.

6. Ethical Considerations

Post-publication discussions must adhere to the same ethical standards applied to original submissions.

Contributions containing the following will not be considered for publication:

Plagiarism.
Personal attacks.
Discriminatory language.
Unsubstantiated accusations.
Misleading information.

The journal is committed to fostering an environment of respectful academic discourse and scientific integrity.

7. Outcomes of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussions may lead to:

Clarification of published findings.
Publication of corrections or corrigenda.
Editorial notes or expressions of concern.
Retraction of an article when significant scientific or ethical issues are confirmed.
Further scientific dialogue that enhances understanding of the topic.

Any actions resulting from post-publication discussions will follow the journal's established policies on corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions.

8. Transparency and Record Keeping

All accepted post-publication discussions and author responses will become part of the permanent scholarly record and will be linked to the relevant article whenever possible. This practice ensures transparency and promotes continued scientific engagement within the research community.

Correction and Retraction

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is committed to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record. Corrections are issued when errors are identified that do not invalidate the scientific findings of a published article. Retractions may be issued in cases of plagiarism, research misconduct, data fabrication or falsification, duplicate publication, ethical violations, or major errors that compromise the reliability of the research. All allegations are investigated fairly and confidentially by the Editorial Board. Correction notices, expressions of concern, and retraction notices are permanently linked to the original article to ensure transparency and uphold the highest standards of publication ethics.

1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when errors are identified in a published article that affect the accuracy of the publication but do not invalidate its overall findings, methodology, or conclusions.

Corrections may be published for issues including, but not limited to:

Errors in author names, affiliations, or correspondence details.
Mistakes in funding information or acknowledgments.
Minor errors in data presentation, figures, tables, or references.
Editorial or typographical errors that could affect interpretation.
Omissions that require clarification but do not compromise the validity of the research.

When a correction is approved, JAK will publish a formal correction notice that is linked to the original article. The correction notice will clearly describe the nature of the amendment and the date on which it was issued.

The original article will remain accessible with appropriate cross-references to the correction notice.

2. Retractions

A retraction is issued when a published article is found to contain significant errors or ethical breaches that render the findings unreliable or compromise the integrity of the publication.

Retraction may be considered in cases including:

Fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of research data.
Plagiarism or substantial unattributed use of others' work.
Duplicate, redundant, or simultaneous publication.
Serious methodological errors that invalidate the study's conclusions.
Unethical research practices or violations of ethical standards.
Manipulation of the peer-review process.
Undisclosed conflicts of interest that significantly influence the reported findings.
Other forms of scientific misconduct that undermine the credibility of the publication.

The primary purpose of retraction is to correct the scholarly record rather than to punish authors.

3. Investigation Procedure

When concerns are raised regarding a published article, the Editorial Office will undertake a fair, objective, and confidential investigation.

The process may include:

Preliminary assessment of the reported concern.
Communication with the corresponding author and, when necessary, co-authors.
Request for supporting data, documentation, or explanations.
Consultation with reviewers, editorial board members, or relevant institutions.
Evaluation of all available evidence before reaching a final decision.

Throughout the investigation, JAK will respect the principles of due process, confidentiality, and fairness.

4. Retraction Notice

If a retraction is deemed necessary, JAK will publish a formal retraction notice that:

Is clearly identified as a retraction.
Is freely accessible to all readers.
States the reasons for the retraction.
Includes the title and citation details of the retracted article.
Identifies whether the retraction was initiated by the authors, editors, or other parties.
Remains permanently linked to the original article.

To preserve the scholarly record, the original article will remain available online but will be clearly marked as "Retracted" on every page.

5. Expressions of Concern

In situations where serious concerns have been raised but an investigation has not yet reached a conclusion, the Editor-in-Chief may issue an Expression of Concern to alert readers to potential issues regarding the reliability or integrity of the article.

The Expression of Concern may subsequently be replaced by a correction, retraction, or editorial statement depending on the outcome of the investigation.

6. Author-Initiated Corrections and Retractions

Authors who discover significant errors in their published work are expected to promptly notify the Editorial Office and cooperate fully in the correction or retraction process.

The Editorial Board will evaluate the request and determine the most appropriate course of action in accordance with the journal's ethical standards.

7. Transparency and Publication Ethics

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) follows internationally recognized principles of publication ethics and is committed to handling corrections and retractions in a transparent, timely, and responsible manner. All editorial decisions regarding corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions are made solely to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

Ownership and Management Information

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is owned by the Tadulako University, Indonesia, and is managed by an independent Editorial Team comprising academics and researchers in the field of chemistry and related disciplines. The journal operates under principles of editorial independence, transparency, academic integrity, and ethical publishing. Editorial decisions are made solely on the basis of scientific merit, originality, quality, and relevance to the journal's scope, without influence from the journal owner, sponsors, advertisers, or other external parties. The journal's organizational structure, editorial board, policies, and contact information are publicly available on the journal website to ensure transparency and accountability in scholarly publishing.

The ownership structure of Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) ensures that all editorial decisions are made independently and are based solely on scholarly merit, scientific quality, originality, and relevance to the journal's scope.

The owner does not interfere with editorial evaluations, peer-review processes, or publication decisions.

Journal Management

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is administered by an Editorial Team consisting of qualified academics, researchers, and professionals with expertise in chemistry and related fields.

The journal is managed through a transparent editorial structure that includes:

Editor-in-Chief, responsible for the overall editorial direction, policy development, and final publication decisions.
Managing Editor, responsible for journal administration, workflow management, and communication with authors, reviewers, and editors.
Editorial Board, responsible for supporting editorial policies, maintaining publication quality, and providing subject-matter expertise.
Reviewers (Peer Reviewers), responsible for evaluating manuscripts based on scientific quality, originality, methodological rigor, and relevance.
Technical and Production Team, responsible for manuscript processing, copyediting, layout editing, and online publication.

Editorial Independence

JAK maintains complete editorial independence from its owner, sponsors, advertisers, and other stakeholders.

Editorial decisions are based exclusively on:

Scientific merit and originality of the manuscript.
Relevance to the journal's aims and scope.
Quality of research methodology and presentation.
Compliance with publication ethics and academic standards.
Reviewer recommendations and editorial assessment.

No commercial, political, institutional, or personal interests are permitted to influence editorial decisions.

Governance and Transparency

The management of JAK is guided by principles of transparency, accountability, academic integrity, and ethical publishing.

The journal adopts internationally recognized best practices in scholarly publishing and continuously works to improve its editorial processes and publication quality.

Information regarding journal policies, editorial members, peer-review procedures, publication ethics, author guidelines, and publication fees (if applicable) is made publicly available on the journal's official website to ensure transparency and accountability to authors, reviewers, readers, and indexing institutions.

Contact Information

The journal's contact details, editorial office address, official email address, and website are publicly displayed to facilitate communication between the journal and its stakeholders. Any inquiries related to editorial policies, submissions, ethical concerns, or publication matters may be directed to the Editorial Office.

Peer Review Process

Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review.

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) follows a single-blinded peer review process, following the practices of good scholarly journals and to ensure impartial editorial decision making.

1. Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system. Occasionally, Jurnal Akademika Kimia may accept submissions by email.

2. Editorial Office Assessment

Jurnal Akademika Kimia checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. Once the article passes through this step, articles are subjected to editorial review for focus and scope, relevance, and other standard requirements.

3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief

The Editor-in-Chief checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal focus and scopes and is sufficiently original and interesting, and then assigns an Editor who handles the peer review. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

4. Invitation to Reviewers

The section editor sends invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained.

5. Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They then accept or decline. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers.

6. Review is Conducted

The reviewers read it closely and provide individual critiques, usually within one to two weeks. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered.

7. Editor Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The section editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. Depending on reviewer commentary and recommendations, manuscripts may be sent back to authors for revision. After the section editor receives the revised manuscript, it is assigned to the reviewer(s) once again, for approval of changes. But the final decision to publish is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version, unless they have opted out of further participation. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the section editor.

Publication Schedule

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is published 4 (four) times a year (February, May, August, and November) which includes articles of the latest scientific work in English in the fields of Chemistry Education and Chemistry. Each issue contains 8 to 10 articles which comprise 200-250 pages.

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or/institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative and adheres to the best practice and high publishing standards

Archiving

Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) utilizes the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system to create a distributed archiving network among participating libraries and institutions. This system ensures that multiple copies of the journal's content are securely preserved and remain accessible for long-term use. Through LOCKSS, JAK is committed to safeguarding its scholarly content against data loss and ensuring the permanent availability of published articles as part of the global scientific record.

Publication Fee

All articles published in Jurnal Akademika Kimia (JAK) are open access and freely available online, immediately upon publication. This is made possible by an article-processing charge (APC) that covers the range of publishing services we provide.

Jurnal Akademika Kimia charges the following fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Article Publication: 400,000.00 (IDR)

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an article publication fee to cover publication services.

Copyright and License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Under this licensing arrangement, copyright of the published work remains fully vested in the author(s). The author(s) retain unrestricted ownership of the copyright and grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish, reproduce, distribute, archive, and communicate the work to the public as part of the journal's publishing activities. This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and the authors will retain publishing rights without restrictions and allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

	All	Since 2021
Citations	3473	2478
h-index	28	24
i10-index	87	67