Cross-Sectional Survey : The Influence of Various Teacher Backgrounds on West Kalimantan Chemistry TPACK Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2023.v12.i1.pp1-12Keywords:
Chemistry teacher, TPACK, demographic factorsAbstract
This study aims to examine teachers' perceptions of their Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) about age, gender, length of teaching, work location, teacher status, teacher education, and certification programs. This study used a cross-sectional survey method used in non-experimental quantitative research. The population in this study were all chemistry teachers in West Kalimantan using a purposive sampling technique obtain 70 to respondents from 14 districts. The survey consisted of 28 statement items and distributed questionnaires via Google form to chemistry teachers. Chemistry teachers rated themselves on a 5-point scale. All domains of the TPACK framework demonstrated valid and reliable instruments on Pearson's correlation values and Cronbach's Alpha Kruskal Wallis non-parametric test, Pearson's correlation was performed to analyze the data. Significant differences can be seen in the CK domain when viewed from gender differences with a p for CK of 0.044, so there is a significant difference between the gender of women (Mean = 4.08 SD = 0.416) and men (Mean = 4.32 SD = 0.470). Location of work affects the teacher's TCK and TPACK because there is a significant difference when viewed from the p namely the TCK and TPACK of 0.036 and 0.025. Perceptions of teachers' TPACK abilities were greater for teachers in cities than in villages in both the TCK domain (Mean = 3.58; 3.82 SD = 0.430; 0.466) and TPACK (Mean = 3.63; 3.91 SD = 0.483; 0.554).
References
Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Asaki, I. A. (2023). Factors contributing to teachers’ conceptual difficulties in teaching high school organic chemistry. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 49–67.
Astuti, W., Supanto, F., & Supriyadi, B. (2020). Culinary SME’s: Entrepreneurial education skill in uncertainty conditions. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(24), 45-51.
Calacar, G. B. (2020). Teaching the 2st century skills: Theachers’ competence, practices, and challenges. Journal of World English and Educational Practices (JWEEP), 2(2), 81–91.
Cetin-Dindar, A., Boz, Y., Sonmez, D. Y., & Celep, N. D. (2018). Development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(October), 167–83.
Chang, R., & Overby, J. (2011). General chemistry: The essential concepts. McGraw-Hill Science: New York.
Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H. J., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1–14.
Dorfman, B. S., Terrill, B., Patterson, K., Yarden, A., & Blonder, R. (2019). Teachers personalize videos and animations of biochemical processes: Results from a professional development workshop. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(May), 772–86.
Ege, S. N., Coppola, B. P.,& Lawton, R. G. (1997). The University of Michigan undergraduate chemistry curriculum 1. philosophy, curriculum, and the nature of change. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(1), 74–83.
Hayati, Nurlaila., Kadarohman, A., Sopandi, W., Martoprawiro, M. A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2022). A new decade for social changes. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 34(7), 237–47.
Irwanto, I., Redhana, I. W., & Wahono, B. (2022). Examining perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A perspective from Indonesian pre-service teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 142–54.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.
Joharmawan, R., Ibnu, S., Munzil., & Fajaroh, F. (2021). Perception profile of content knowledge and technological pedagogy of chemistry teachers and the quality of their implementation in the development of RPP and chemistry learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 1061–1069.
Kartimi., Gloria, R. Y., & Anugrah, I. R. (2021). Chemistry online distance learning during the covid-19 outbreak: Do TPACK and teachers’ attitude matter?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 228–240.
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 1-19.
Liunokas, S. M., Louise, I. S. Y., & Sampouw, F. (2021). Chemistry teacher’s perception about their technology, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) (pp. 315-321). Atlantis Press: Netherlands.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Ozdilek, Z., & Robeck, E. C. (2019). Enabling pre-service chemistry teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through case-based lesson planning. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 207–225.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Partnership for 21st century skills-core content integration. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.marietta.edu/sites/default/files/documents/21st_century_skills_standards_book_2.pdf.
Putra, I. N. T. A., Kartini, K. S., & Widiyaningsih, N. N. (2019). Implementasi media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis mobile pada materi hidrokarbon. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia 4(2), 43–52.
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations. International Journal of Research in English (IJREE), 4(1), 80–88.
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers and Education, 157(November), 1-12.
Şen, Ş. (2020). Modelling the relations between Turkish chemistry teachers’ sense of efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge in context. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(7), 1–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sulaiman, J., & Ismail, S. N. (2020). Teacher competence and 21st century skills in transformation schools 2025 (TS25). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3536–3544.
Unesco. (2015). Education for all 2000 - 2015: Achievements and challenges. Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/efa-achievements-challenges.
Zamora, J. T., & Zamora, J. J. M. (2022). 21st century teaching skills and teaching standards competence level of teacher. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 220–238.
Zimmermann, F., Insa-Melle., & Huwer, J. (2021). Developing prospective chemistry teachers’ TPACK-A comparison between students of two different universities and expertise levels regarding their TPACK self-efficacy, attitude, and lesson planning competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1863–1874.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ninda Permasari, Nahadi, Hernani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
