Application of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model to Student Learning Outcomes in Hydrocarbon Material in Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2023.v12.i4.pp221-225Keywords:
Think-pair-share, cooperative learning, learning outcomesAbstract
This study aims to describe the improvement of student learning outcomes by applying the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on hydrocarbon material in class XI SMA Negeri 2 Sigi. This study's research type is pre-experimental with a one-group pretest posttest design. This study utilized purposive sampling. The sample consisted of two classes: class XI IPA 3 as the experimental class 1 (n = 22) and class XI IPA 4 as the experimental class 2 (n = 24). Student learning outcomes data are processed using the learning improvement test (N-gain). The application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model to improve student learning outcomes on Hydrocarbons can be seen from the average N-gain value in the two experimental classes, including in the high category, namely 0.77 and 0.78. Therefore, applying the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model can improve student learning outcomes on average greater than 75 (KKM) of SMA Negeri 2 Sigi students in Class XI on hydrocarbon material.
References
Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the subject is difficult?. Educación Química, 23(2), 305-310.
De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(January), 631–642.
Erza, F., & Nasrudin, H. (2017). Capaian keterlaksanaan strategi predict discuss explain observe discuss explain (pdeode) untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi kesetimbangan kimia kelas XI SMAN 1 Krembung Sidoarjo. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 6(2), 190-195.
Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students’ critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3-24.
Lumentut, R. S., Said, I., & Mustapa, K. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran quided inquiri dengan mind map terhadap hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa pada materi redoks di kelas X SMA Negeri 5 Palu. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 6(2), 113-118.
Marhaeni, N. H., Ramos, S. V., Triyadi, T., & Sudarmaji, B. (2022). The effect of think pair share learning model to improve student’s problem-solving ability. Jurnal Mercumatika: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 32-39.
Masitoh. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Mufarizuddin. (2018). Improving learning outcomes by using think pair share (TPS) cooperative learning model at Primary School students. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2), 77-85.
Mulyasa, E. (2019). Menjadi guru profesional menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students' in-class participation. Learning and Individual Differences, 88(May), 1-11.
Nurzannah., & Setiawan, H. R. (2022). The 2013 curriculum learning process in Senior High School. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1721-1732.
Rahmah, N., Merdekawati, K., & Diniaty, A. (2019). The implementation of think pair share (TPS) learning model toward student achievement learning in material acid and base in grade XI MA Sunan Pandanaran Academic Year 2018/2019. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 3(2), 70-75.
Southworth, J. (2022). Bridging critical thinking and transformative learning: The role of perspective-taking. Theory and Research in Education, 20(1), 44-63.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukelasmini, I. G. A. M. (2019). The implementation of think pair share (TPS) type of cooperative learning model to improve student’s motivation and nutrition science learning achievement. Journal of Education Action Research, 3(1), 9-15.
Syahrastani. (2022). The effect of direct learning model with routine practice on self-efficacy and student learning outcomes. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 10(1), 47-52.
Taber, K. S. (2020). Conceptual confusion in the chemistry curriculum: Exemplifying the problematic nature of representing chemical concepts as target knowledge. Foundations of Chemistry 22(September), 309–334.
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(15), 1-12.
Yunitasari, W., Susilowati, E., & Nurhayati, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran direct instruction disertai hierarki konsep untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan penyangga kelas XI semester genap SMA Negeri 2 Sragen tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 182-190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moh. Kifli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
