Analysis of Chemical Practicum Improtation Constraints in MAN 2 City of Palu

Authors

  • Ijirana Ijirana Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Rizal Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Suherman Suherman Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Supriadi Supriadi Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, FKIP, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v19i2.1149

Keywords:

Constraint Analysis, Chemistry Practicum, Facilities and Infrastructure

Abstract

This study uses a case study research type with a descriptive case study approach that aims to describe the obstacles faced by MAN 2 Palu City in implementing chemistry practicums. The subjects in this study were 153 consisting of the head of the chemistry LAB, chemistry subject teachers, and students from all classes of XI IPA. The instruments used in this data collection were structured interviews, observations and distribution of questionnaires to all students of class XI IPA. Based on the results of the study and data analysis, it shows that the percentage of the indicators of chemistry laboratory facilities and infrastructure is 72.7% and the indicator of teacher ability in implementing chemistry practicums is 67.7% with the category of not constrained. For the indicator of the implementation of chemistry practicums, the presentation is 61.8% and the indicator of laboratory assistants/assistants in the chemistry laboratory is 59.4% with the category of constrained. So it can be said that the implementation of chemistry practicums at MAN 2 Palu City is categorized as not constrained. However, there are still several factors that are of concern to the parties such as MAN 2 Palu City, such as students are still constrained in understanding the theory and work procedures contained in the LKPD, then the management of supporting facilities and infrastructure for the chemistry laboratory at MAN 2 Palu City is still inefficient.

References

Hofstein, A, “The laboratory in chemistry education: thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research”, Chemistry Education: Research And Practice. 5(3), 2004, pp 247-264.

Istarani, “Kumpulan 39 Metode Pembelajaran. Edisi I”, Medan: CV Iscom Medan, 2012.

Rustaman, “Peranan Praktikum Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. [Online]. Di akses dari http://file.upi.edu/direktori/sps/prodi.pendidikan_ipa/195012311979032nuryani_rustaman/peranan_praktikum_dalam_pembelajaran _biologi.pdf, 2009.

Junaidi, E., Hadisaputra, S., & Al Idrus, S. W, “Kajian pelaksanaan praktikum kimia di sekolah menengah atas di kabupaten Lombok Barat Indonesia”, Jurnal Pijar MIPA. 13(1), 2018, pp 24-31.

Pusat Kurikulum, “Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi”, Jakarta: Balitbang Depdiknas, 2003.

Indrawan, “Implementasi permendiknas no. 24 tahun 2007 tentang standar sarana dan prasarana pada MTS Al-ihsaniyah dan MTS Aisyiyah 1 Palembang”, Jurnal manajemen pendidikan islam. 1(2), 2019, pp 147-162.

Rosilawati, R, “The Evaluation On The Management Of Science Laboratory In State Senior High Schools In Tambun Utara Of The District Bekasi”, Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan. 3(2), 2012, pp 118-130.

Ibrahim & Bafadal, “Manajemen Perlengkapan SekolahTeori dan Aplikasinya”, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Rahmiyati, S, “The effectiveness of laboratory use in madrasah aliyah in yogyakarta” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 11(1), 2008, pp 88-100.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03

How to Cite

[1]
I. Ijirana, M. Rizal, S. Suherman, and S. Supriadi, “Analysis of Chemical Practicum Improtation Constraints in MAN 2 City of Palu”, ME, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 132-136, Mar. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)