Peer Review Process

This journal employs a double-blind review system, ensuring that both the authors' and reviewers' identities are kept confidential. The Editor conducts an initial assessment to verify that the manuscript adheres to the journal's guidelines and is relevant to the subject matter. If the manuscript does not meet these criteria, it may be rejected at this initial stage. If it passes this evaluation, the Editor selects at least two independent experts in the relevant field to review the manuscript. They will provide feedback on the strengths, weaknesses, and suggest improvements. This review process takes up to three weeks from the time the reviewers are assigned. We ensure that the review process is conducted objectively, without influence from the authors' reputation or their institutions. Throughout this process, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous. After the review, authors receive feedback, comments, and recommendations for revisions from the reviewers. If revisions are deemed necessary, authors are strongly encouraged to address the identified issues promptly to facilitate acceptance for publication.

Final Decision: The Editor, considering the reviewers' comments and the revised manuscript, makes a final decision on whether to accept, reject, or request further revisions. This decision is communicated to the authors along with the reviewers' comments. However, the Editorial team reserves the right to make the final decision.