EXPLORING TADULAKO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES IN USING AI-BASED GRAMMAR TOOLS FOR ACADEMIC WRITING
Keywords:
AI-based grammar tools, academic writing, EFL students, students' perspectivesAbstract
This study aimed to explore the perspectives of English Education students at Tadulako University toward the use of AI-based grammar tools in academic writing. Employing a qualitative exploratory design, the study involved students from the 2023 cohort who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a qualitative response questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with five participants. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns in students' perceptions, experiences, and challenges. The findings revealed that students generally hold positive perspectives toward AI-based grammar tools such as Grammarly, QuillBot, and ChatGPT, perceiving them as effective in reducing grammatical errors, improving sentence clarity, and enhancing writing organization. Students also reported that consistent engagement with AI feedback increased their awareness of recurring writing mistakes and boosted their confidence when submitting academic assignments. Moreover, AI tools were commonly used during the revision stage, functioning as editing aids rather than primary writing assistants. However, several challenges were also identified, including contextually inaccurate suggestions, confusion arising from excessive feedback options, limited access to premium features, and concerns about over-reliance. These findings suggest that while AI-based grammar tools provide substantial support for writing development, their educational value depends on how critically and responsibly students engage with them. Educators are encouraged to integrate guidance on the reflective use of AI tools in academic writing instruction to promote learner autonomy and prevent dependency.
References
Agzamxanova, G., & Golovko, Y. (2025). How AI tools can support English writing development. Educator Insights: Journal of Teaching Theory and Practice, 1(3), 27–33.
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Ariyanto, M. S. A., Mukminatien, N., & Tresnadewi, S. (2019). Students' and teacher's perceptions towards the implementation of ProWritingAid and teacher feedback. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(10), 1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i10.12843
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), A223–A236.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fitria, T. N. (2023). ProWritingAid as AI-powered writing tools: The performance in checking grammar and spelling of students' writing. Polingua (Scientific Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Education), 12(2), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v12i2.276
Jaya, S., & Susyla, D. (2024). Assessing students’ perceptions of AI grammar and writing assistance tools: Implications for academic writing instruction. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE), 4(3). https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v4i3.7535
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Maghfirah, W., Zainuddin, Z., & Hamdani, B. (2025). Balancing precision and voice: A qualitative study of QuillBot's role in enhancing EFL students' writing skills. Tamaddun, 24(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i1.950
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
O'Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students' perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Park, J. (2019). An AI-based English grammar checker vs. human raters in evaluating EFL learners' writing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 112–131.
Pratama, A., & Sulistiyo, U. (2024). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in enhancing English foreign learners' writing skill. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.299
Purnomo, D. R. P., & Andriani, Z. Z. D. (2025). Students’ perception of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in academic writing. IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(1), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.5131
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994
Safitri, M., & Fithriani, R. (2024). Exploring higher education EFL students' perception of AI writing tools in the 5.0 era. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v7i1.3158
Setiawan, F., & Alkhowarizmi, A. (2025). Exploring an artificial intelligence as automated feedback program in EFL writing. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(1), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v16i1.1206
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Syarifah, E. F., & Fakhruddin, A. (2024). Exploring students' experience in using AI to assist their writing. Journal of English Language Learning, 8(1), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v8i1.10028
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2023). To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students' acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Faiz Ibrahim, Konder Manurung, Moh. Abraham Akbar Eisenring, Abdul Kamaruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with e-Journal English Language Teaching Society (ELTS) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
